The Journal of
Regression Therapy, V. 17, 2007, pp. 43-57
Dealing With Attaching
Souls and Entities
by Jan Erik Sigdell
A workshop at the First European Summer
School of the European Association of Regression Therapists in
Frankfurt am Main, Germany, August 22-24, 2006
Abstract
This article discusses
cases in which it is found that the client has an attaching foreign
soul or entity, how this can be discovered and what we can then do
about it. It also discusses a theological background relating to the
world view of the Gnostic Christians, which fits very well to not only
cases of this kind but also to regression experiences in general. The
question is dealt with why souls and entities sometimes attach to
persons, and the role of the aura in this respect. A possibility to
free another person, other than the client, who is not present, is
described.
What is the difference
between a soul and an entity?
I use the following
definitions in order to state a difference between two cases in a
simple manner:
Theological background
As a background, let me
briefly sketch the world view of Gnostic Christianity. I find in my
work throughout more than 25 years that this world view fits better
than any other I know to experiences of past existences in regressions
and to experiences of the phenomenon we are dealing with here.
The Gnostic Christians
taught reincarnation, but began to be regarded as heretics as defined
by the Council of Nicaea in 325. Origen was a Gnostic Christian. The
Church claims that he opposed reincarnation, but an in-depth research
in his work reveals the opposite. The statement of the Church is based
on censored versions of Origen’s texts. I have dealt extensively
with this and many other things in my book Reinkarnation, Christentum
und das kirchliche Dogma[1], downloadable in an English
translation from my website[2].
The Gnostic Christians
taught that we are “fallen angels,” in the sense that we
existed from the beginning of Creation as entities or spiritual beings
in God’s world of light. Some of us, however, began to feel
weariness for the existence in the light world, “satiated with
the vision of God,” and wanted to have experiences that the light
world couldn’t offer us. Stated with a popular expression: we
wanted more “action”…We wanted to be able to fully
live out our free will. This wasn’t possible in the light world,
since we were there so much in communion with the others, that if we
would hurt another entity, we would in the same moment feel its pain
ourselves. This is a kind of “instantaneous karma.”
Therefore, we never hurt anyone, but came to view this condition as a
limitation of our free will. If we would freely live it out, conflicts
with the free will of others would be unavoidable, and then we would at
the same time hurt ourselves. We wanted God to give us a form of
existence that wouldn’t have this limitation.
God therefore created new
worlds. He created nine angelic levels of existence, a human 10th
level, and an 11th level: the level of demons and adversaries. The
entities – better called “negative entities” –
we are dealing with here can be assumed to belong to that 11th level.
We humans became souls
which, as the Gnostics put it, “for punishment were put in bodies
like in prisons.” Here, we will also have to suffer the pain
ourselves which we cause to others, but not instantaneously. It comes
later with a time delay, often in a later incarnation; this is called
“karma.” Otherwise we couldn’t live out our free will
even in such ways that don’t respect the free will and integrity
of another person. But through “karma” we still do
experience ourselves what we once did to others and thus slowly learn
how wrong and futile this is, since at the end we will still have to
pay for it ourselves.
Why don’t some
souls go to the light world when they leave the body?
What normally occurs after a
soul has left the body is that, after some time (of varying duration),
it leaves the “earth plane” and enters a light world (which
I presume will be a peripheral region of God’s light world).
After a time of largely varying duration the soul then reincarnates in
a new body. But why do a few of them stay here and attach to living
bodies (which already have their own souls), instead of going to the
light?
There will be varying
reasons, but one typical case is the materialist. He has spent a whole
incarnation being convinced that there is no life after death; that
when he dies his self would simply cease to exist. Now he finds himself
outside his dead body and can look down upon it. He is confused and
disturbed: “This isn’t possible!” He finds himself in
this totally unexpected condition. He may see a light far away and feel
an attraction towards it, and reacts. “If I go there, I surely
will be really dead. Better I try to stay here.”
He discovers that it is
easier to stay here if he clings to a living body. He can hold on to
it, he can take life energy from it (usually not malevolently, but
simply since he doesn’t see another way to get the energy he
needs) and he may seek to have experiences through the
“host,” which he enjoyed having when he was incarnated. The
latter can take a somewhat malevolent aspect if he seeks to enjoy
alcohol through animating the “host” to drink more, if he
seeks to experience certain forms of “kinky” sex through
him, and the like, but he will feel a disappointment, since it
doesn’t work very well for him. After all, it doesn’t feel
to him like it used to. I have little doubt that drug addicts usually
have souls of dead drug addicts with them.
Another case is the fear of
punishment. If the soul in his incarnation believed in hell and eternal
damnation, he may for that reason fear to go to the light. Looking back
upon his life he will realize that he did a lot of things he should not
have done: “If I go to the light, they may send me to hell”
– so he tries to stay here.
Of course, there cannot be
an eternal damnation, since this would contradict the love of God. The
Gnostics taught that after death some souls could descend to the 11th
level (as a kind of hell), but not forever, only for the time needed
for insight, regret, repentance, and changing the attitude. Then the
soul would return to the level of the humans.
There will certainly be
several more reasons why a soul wants to stay here. Usually the
intention of the soul isn’t really malevolent, but it seeks
refuge. It is fearful and confused and feels safer clinging to a body.
There are cases that are more negative. For example, someone may seek
to take revenge after dying, or someone strives to prevent the
revelation of a secret by the “host” (usually about the
person the soul was). Or the soul wants the “host” to die
too so that their souls can be together again since they were friends
or lovers. In the view of the soul this doesn’t seem to be such a
bad thing.
Then there is the case of,
for example, the possessive mother who always thought that she knew
better than the son what he should do and what not to do. After dying
she believes that she still has to stay with him and control his life.
She thinks it is a good thing and doesn’t realize how selfish she
is. Another case is the soul seeking forgiveness for what it has done
to the “host,” but this normally doesn’t work (since
the “host” doesn’t know what is going on), and such a
soul will eventually realize this and leave. Or it doesn’t want
to leave a beloved person. If that beloved person after a few years
finds a new partner, the soul might try to sabotage their relationship.
Some souls are even trapped
by the grief of the surviving loved one and cannot leave because they
are held back through it. When we have “lost” someone we
loved (but not really lost since he or she still exists), we must, of
course, go through a period of grief, but never “wallow” in
it for all the rest of our life, since that way we could cause much
harm to the soul. In such a case, the grief becomes rather
selfish…
And so on…
There are rare cases in
which we were born with an attached soul that followed us from another
incarnation (and may even have done so through a few incarnations). And
there are also rare cases in which one “inherits” a soul.
It had earlier attached to, for example, the mother, and after she died
it switched to one of her children.
If a woman has lost a child
through a spontaneous or even intentional abortion, it is not rare that
the soul of the child stays with her. If she becomes pregnant again,
the soul may once again enter the fetus (or rather: attach to it in the
natural process to become born with a new body, which is a positive
attachment and not the kind of attachment we are dealing with here).
This can even happen in the presumably quite rare case that the woman
lost the child so early that she never became aware of being pregnant
and, therefore, doesn’t know she was.
What about negative
entities?
For a long period of time, I
dealt with cases of attaching negative entities according to William J.
Baldwin (1939-2004)[3], and it worked very well.
However, in rare cases, I had to give up. Later, I found another way to
deal with such cases and since have not yet had to give up.
Baldwin states three
principles in connection with negative entities:
So why do they seek to
control a human being? They enjoy power and have forgotten what love
is. They have fun out of manipulating humans. And they are told to do
so. They furthermore can experience rapture from doing what they do. In
their attitude they are usually quite arrogant and rather sly. But at
the same time they are, in a way, often a bit dumb and dull. If I ask
the entity (through the client):
Jan Erik: “How
long
are you doing this to people?”
Entity: (It may say)
“Several hundred years.”
Jan Erik:
“Isn’t
it becoming pretty dull to always do the same thing?”
Entity: “I
don’t
know anything else and I have been told to do this.”
Jan Erik:
“Wouldn’t you like to try something different”
Entity:
“What???”
It seems hard for it to
imagine doing something else, and what it could be.
So what do the negative
entities do? One common thing is to make the client have strong
negative emotions like fear or hatred. They stir up such emotions in
us. When we have strong negative emotions we “excrete”
corresponding energies from ourselves and such entities feed on them.
Like a plant feeds on our physical excretions, they feed on our
emotional excretions. They are energetic coprophagists…
Let us now compare with the
world-view scheme of the Gnostic Christians. It could be as follows. We
feed on nature and through it on the light, which the plants absorb.
The angels will feed directly on light. The entities of the 11th level
have no light, but must feed on something. They may have no alternative
to feeding on the energetic waste from the level of the humans...
How do we discover the
presence of a foreign soul or a negative entity with the client?
There are certain symptoms
which may indicate the presence of a soul or entity. To these belong
moments of an inexplicable lack of energy, sometimes impulses or urges
to do something one doesn’t really want to (such urges could be
drinking to much, taking drugs, gambling, straying in brothels, etc.,
even though they may have other causes), in more rare cases hearing a
voice (in which case the person may fear to become insane).
In the regression technique,
which I use, a “guide” or “counsellor” plays an
important role. I understand this guide to normally be a way to meet
your own unconscious self, as if it stands in front of you in some more
or less symbolic appearance, so that you can talk directly with your
unconscious self.[4]
When we meet the guide the
first time in a regression, there is an important first question to
ask: “How do you feel with this appearance?” If it is the
real guide, one will feel good with it – safe, peaceful, one
feels love from him or her. In rare cases, this is not so. If the
appearance is unpleasant, doesn’t give a feeling of love, maybe
even frightening, it is not the real guide. In most such cases it is a
foreign presence; a soul or a being who doesn’t want to be
discovered. It tries to make us believe that it would be the guide, but
this never feels right. In such a case we leave that figure and
continue until we find the real guide with which the client has a good
feeling. The first question we have the client ask the guide in such a
case is: “Who was it you met on the way? A part of yourself or a
foreign presence?” The usual answer is: “A foreign
presence” or “A soul or a negative entity”; more
often “A soul.”
If there is an unconscious
resistance to seeing a scene in the past (or maybe to hear the answer
of the guide), I let the guide take the resisting part of the
unconscious self out and put it at the client’s side. What does
it look like? I then tell the client to ask the guide to take care of
that part. Then the client goes back in the past scene (leaving the
resisting part with the guide) and can go on with the experience (or
can hear the guide’s answer). This resisting part can also be a
foreign soul or entity, which is, however, rarely the case.
In rare cases the client
claims to know he/she has a foreign presence or suspects it before we
go in the regression. Then the question arises, if this is really so or
not. The first step is to find this out through asking the guide about
it.
Rarely the foreign presence
is discovered in still another way.
So what do we do then?
More often the foreign
presence is that of a soul rather than of a negative entity. We ask the
guide to show the soul to the client and we start a conversation with
it, intermediated by the client. The “classical” method to
deal with this is to motivate and encourage the soul to go to the
light. We try to make clear to it that it is missing a marvellous
opportunity when it stays here, in ignorance of the wonderful world
that is expecting it in the light. It may fear judgment and punishment
in the light world, but there is no such thing there. There is only
relief, recovery, and peace, but also self-evaluation of the life left
behind. There is no hell. No one is punished, but we ourselves choose
our next life according to what lesson we need to learn. These are all
things we talk about with the soul and try to make it understand.
The case of an attaching
soul can be compared to a child staying in the school-yard when the
school year is over, while the other children go to the summer
holidays.
As time went on I was
brought to learn a new approach. A female client had a soul of a woman
with her. They had been very close friends. The soul liked so much to
be with the client that it didn’t want to go to the light. Then
all of a sudden the client said:
Client: “But I
can go
to the light with her!”
Jan Erik: “OK,
tell me
when you are there together.”
Client: “Now we
are
there.”
Jan Erik: “Ask
your
friend how she feels in the light.”
Client: “She
is
astonished. She hadn’t expected that it would be so
wonderful!”
Jan Erik: “Ask
her if
she wants to stay there.”
Client: “Yes,
she
wants to.”
Jan Erik: “Then
say
goodbye to her and go back to your guide.”
Since then I always do it in
a similar manner. “Ask the guide to show the soul to you!”
We then would like to know if that soul and the client knew each other
while the soul was incarnated. They may have but is not always the
case. We would also like that the client can forgive the soul for
having been there, which is usually not difficult. Then I typically
say:
“Ask the guide to show
both of you the entrance to the light world!”
They will see it. “Now take the soul with you
and go together through that entrance into the light world.”
“Ask the soul how it
feels to be in the light world.” Always very well indeed.
“Ask it if it wants to
stay.” Nearly always: “Yes”
“Do you see light
beings, maybe like angels, around?”
If not: “Call them and
tell me when they are there”
“Ask them to take care
of the soul. Then you return to your guide.”
It sometimes happens that
there are more souls than one. Then I usually do it with one after the
other. It is very rare that the soul doesn’t want to stay in the
light world. We ask why. Then we ask the light beings to explain to the
soul that there is really nothing that she can do on the earth plane,
anymore – for no one. But when she incarnates again out of the
light world there is so much more that she can do.
In one case the soul
didn’t want to go to the light and resisted being taken there. I
had the client ask if it remembered having been in a physical body. Of
course it did:
Jan Erik: “And
do you
remember your birth?”
Client: (After some
hesitation as it will have needed a little time to remember)
“Yes.”
Jan Erik: “Then
you
will remember that before your birth you were in your mother’s
womb?”
Client: Again after a
little
hesitation, “Yes”
Jan Erik: “So
where
were you before that? Where did you come from?”
Client: (Apparently
there
was a moment of confusion, and then) “But then I was in the
light!”
Now the soul has nothing at
all against going to the light, anymore…
Heal the aura!
A soul or an entity finds
attachment to a person where the person’s aura has a hole, a weak
place, or some other damage. It can get a grasp there. It is,
therefore, important to have the client ask the guide if there is any
such damage to the aura. There will be. Where over the body? “Now
ask the guide to heal your aura there and all over, and tell me, when
it is done.” After that, another soul or entity will not easily
be able to attach to the person, unless new aura damage occurs.
What causes such aura
damage? Usually intoxication or intense negative feelings. If a person
is heavily drunk (and not just under a moderate influence) or under
influence of heavy drugs (heroin, crack, etc., but hardly a moderate
dose of “grass”), the aura will be damaged or loosened up,
at least temporarily. And while it is, a soul or a negative entity
could attach. Narcosis is, of course, a drug intoxication. It therefore
does happen – but rarely – that a person “picks
up” a soul while in the hospital for an operation. An accident
with loss of consciousness could possibly also have such an effect, as
can exceedingly strong negative emotions, like a very big fear (panic)
or an almost uncontrollably strong rage or hatred, which loosens up the
aura.
Beware of cheating!
If we use the
“classical” method of encouraging the soul to go to the
light, there is a possibility that it may cheat us. It may say:
“OK, I’ll go to the light,” but hides and returns
after the regression. It is, therefore, important to have the client
ask the guide: “Is the soul really gone?” If the guide
confirms this, the soul release will have been successful.
However, if we have the
client accompany the soul into the light, as described above, there
will hardly be a risk that the soul will return. And if the aura is
healed and closed, it would hardly find a grasp, anyway.
How do we deal with
negative entities?
If it turns out that the
foreign influence isn’t from a soul, but from a negative entity,
the case can be a bit harder to deal with. As I mentioned above, I
first worked according to the principles mentioned by Baldwin. Doing it
that way (in my version of the procedure), we ask the being to look
deeply inside itself to see if it has a light inside:
Entity: “Nonsense,
I
have no light!”
Jan Erik: “Well,
look
deeply inside you and you will find out how it is.”
After a while the entity
will reply, with some astonishment:
Entity: “But I
do have
a light inside. I didn’t know that!”
Jan Erik: “Of
course
you have; no one could exist without a light inside, since it is the
source of life. Does it burn?”
Entity: “No!”
Jan Erik: “So
you see:
they have lied to you.”
We then have the guide call
an angel to come from the light world and ask the entity to carefully
touch its light:
Jan Erik: “Does
it
burn?”
Entity: “No! It
almost
blinds me a bit, but it doesn’t burn!”
Jan Erik: “So
again
you see that you have been lied to.”
Now we allude to point 3
mentioned above:
Jan Erik: “You are now
discovered! It could happen that they want to punish you for that! But
you can easily escape it! If you go to the light world with the angel
they cannot reach you and you are safe. How about that?”
If things work rather
easily, the entity may accept this. We then ask the angel to take the
entity to the light world, leave it there and come back without it
(since we may need more help from the angel).
But things are not always so
easy. The entity may resist. We may ask it (see above) if it
isn’t very dull to keep doing the same thing all the time. Of
course it will be:
Entity: “What
else is
there?”
Jan Erik: “If
you go
to the light world there are many new possibilities there, which you
cannot imagine now. And no one has to stay there, you are free to leave
again, but it seems that hardly anyone wants to leave the light world
once one is there.”
Talking to it in such a
manner, we may be able to motivate it to go with the angel. We can also
ask what it gets from doing what it does:
Entity:
“Power!”
Jan Erik: “And
what
about love?”
Entity: “What
is
love?”
We can ask the angel to help
it to understand what love is.
Jan Erik:
“Would you
like to experience that?”
Entity: “Maybe,
sounds
good! But love and power is like fire and water. Where there is power,
there can be no love. No one loves the one who has power, but is with
him only because one has to.”
We ask the angel to make him
understand that.
Jan Erik:
“Would you
like to give it a try?”
Entity: “Why
not…?”
If the entity is still
persistent and refuses to go to the light, we may have to use force and
tell the client: “Ask the angel to encapsulate the entity in a
light capsule” (Baldwin talks about a net of light). Then we ask
the angel to carry the enclosed entity to the light world and leave it
there. Isn’t this brute force? Well, the entity doesn’t
understand the good we are really doing to it! And, as mentioned, no
one is forced to stay there. And should we allow it to stay with the
client and continue to cause harm to him?
I would like to compare this
with a person going through a forest and seeing a man molesting a girl
in the bushes. It is our duty to do whatever we can to save the girl in
such a case, even at the risk of seriously hurting the man or of
getting a knife in our own belly! If we don’t, we will acquire a
load of karma for an act of omission…
A new procedure
What is described above is
the procedure I originally used according to the principles stated by
Baldwin. Later I discovered a new and better way.
I was thinking of the soul
(see above) that first didn’t want to go to the light, until it
remembered that it had already been there. And I thought about the
Gnostic concept of the world. So when a case with an entity came up
again, I first asked the guide to call an angel and then told the
entity:
Jan Erik: “You
have
once been in the light world, but you fell out from it a very long time
ago. Do you remember that?”
Some have a vague memory. If
not, we ask the angel to remind the entity.
Jan Erik: “How
was it
in the light world?”
Entity: “It
was very
nice, indeed!”
Jan Erik: “Do
you want
to go back there?”
Entity: “Can I
really
do that?”
Jan Erik: “Ask
the
angel!”
The angel says
“Yes.”
So far, using this new
approach, I have not had an entity that persisted in refusing to go to
the light! Instead, I even had cases in which the client reported that
the entity became softer and brighter. In one case, it even fell on its
knees and asked the client for forgiveness.
Always with love!
Jesus taught us to love each
and every one. Buddha taught us love and compassion for all sentient
beings. This includes souls who have left their bodies and even
negative entities! We shall treat them with love, too! When a client is
found to have an attaching soul or entity, in that moment we actually
have two clients – the second is the soul or entity! It needs our
help, too, even if at first it doesn’t (want to) realize it.
Therefore, the classical exorcism is really a bad approach! This makes
the soul still more confused and afraid, and it will quickly find a new
“host.” Or if it is an entity, it will feel confirmed in
its negative view and become still more arrogant and spiritually
violent. The new “host” could in the worst case be the
therapist himself! But if we use the approach outlined above, that
seems to be highly improbable.
Haunted places
Foreign presence with
another person
In the regression procedure
I use I have added a technique by Phyllis Krystal in a somewhat
modified and simplified manner.[5]
We have
the guide make a circle of light on the ground or floor (or maybe on a
cloud) where the guide and the client are standing, such that the
client is standing in the middle of the circle. If they are floating in
the air, the circle is floating at the height of the feet. The guide
makes another (empty) circle in front of the client so that the two
circles touch and form like the figure 8. If there is a karmic or other
special relation between the client and another person, often someone
the client knew in a past life, we ask the guide to put that person in
the second circle. It could be a friend today with which the client in
a past life had a perpetrator-victim relationship. It could be an
actual partner or an ex-partner. It could be the mother or father and
so on. We then find symbolic ties between the two. Material ties are
cut and burned, since they symbolize a more or less negative
connection; usually having to do with the one soul having felt hurt by
the other in the past. Immaterial ties, usually rays of light, are
positive and kept. We then tell the client to with his hands to heal
any wounds on both sides that may result from cutting the ties and seek
reconciliation. Normally there will be something to forgive both ways
(it is unlikely that only one has to forgive the other). This is a
healing reconciliation ritual.
Now it could happen that we
discover that the other person has an attaching soul or entity. In such
cases we can do the same thing, as if it would be with the client. I
have had some remarkable positive feedback after doing that. How can
that work? Experience shows that we obviously do create a contact with
the other person on a soul level when standing in the light circles.
Guide or Higher Self?
Above I have mentioned the
“guide” several times as a more or less symbolic appearance
of the client’s unconscious self. In a similar way we can have
the client meet his or her Higher Self. If the client obviously has not
been devoting himself much to spiritual things, but is quite
“down to earth” and with certain doubts gives regression a
chance as a possible way to solve a problem, I prefer to use the guide.
But if the person is spiritually oriented, I usually have him or her
meet their own Higher Self, and then we do the same thing as we would
do with the guide. If someone finds neither the guide nor the Higher
Self, I tell him: “Ask your Higher Self to send you an
angel.” That usually works very well. We then use the angel as a
“guide.”
Some things relating to
regression techniques are here mentioned only very briefly. They are
described extensively in my book (in German, Swedish or Dutch...)
What happens to our
consciousness after we die?
When a soul enters the light
world, it obviously has another, expanded state of consciousness. It
sees most things differently from how it saw it when incarnated. And if
it does, why do some souls fear to go to the light? It seems that this
expansion of consciousness occurs only when we have entered the light,
or it may occur gradually on the way to it. But a soul who stays here
also, to a major degree, remains in a state of consciousness he or she
had while incarnated. In such cases it doesn’t understand what
the light is and fears it. Such a soul may still find earthly things
important, which lose all importance to us when we are in the light. It
doesn’t understand how futile earthly material “joys”
really are, and it may even be blinded by a desire or by a wish for
revenge. Some such souls still care about the material property they
had when incarnated and try to stay to watch and, if possible, care
about it. The latter, however, isn’t possible. They cannot do
anything about it, except to try to stop certain persons from taking
certain actions, which may not work. They will then often be very upset
about what people do with their “property” – which
actually isn’t theirs any more.
Possession and
“circumsession”
In medieval texts one made a
difference between possession (lat. possessio) and
“circumsession” (lat circumsessio). The case of a true
possession is, luckily enough, really rare. In such a case, a soul or
entity wants to completely control the host and, if possible, drive its
soul out of the body to take it over for itself. What we are dealing
with here are cases in which there is an attaching presence of a soul
or an entity, which often tries to influence the host, but not take
complete control over him or her. That is what has been called
“circumsession.”
“Walk in”
Cases of “walk
in” are neither possession nor “circumsession,” but a
very different thing. If, for a period of time, a person is
“clinically dead” (or unconscious), it could happen that
his or her soul actually leaves the body and doesn’t return. To
the soul it means that it is definitely what we call
“dead.” In such a case, another soul could take over the
body, while it can still be revived, like someone takes over a used car
and drives it… What has happened here is an exchange of souls.
The body still has only one soul at a time. It has been suggested that
in this rare case, when it occurs, the new soul often has a specific
task and takes the opportunity for a “shortcut.” This means
that it could then save itself 20 years or more of being born and
growing up, before it can do its task. It has, therefore, been
suggested that "walk-ins" would in many cases be more spiritual than
others. This will, of course, not generally be the case.
[1]. Jan Erik Sigdell: Reinkarnation, Christentum und das
kirchliche Dogma, Ibera, Vienna, 2001. [2]. http://www-christian-reincarnation.com
> ENGLISH > Texts: Reincarnation, Christianity and the Dogma of
the Church (two versions for different paper sizes) . [3]. William J. Baldwin: Spirit
Releasement Therapy, Human Potential Foundation Press, Falls Church
VA, 2nd ed., 3rd printing 1993. [4]. Jan
Erik Sigdell: Reinkarnationstherapie, Heyne, Munich, 2005.
Also published as translations of earlier German editions (out of
print) in Dutch: Putten uit vorige levens, bres/Synthese, Den
Haag, 2004, and in Swedish: Emotionell befrielse genom regression,
Solrosen, Västerås, 1997.
Some earthbound souls, instead of clinging to a person, stay in the
house where they lived while they were in a body. In certain cases this
can be disturbing for those who live there after them. In such cases we
can proceed in the same manner as outlined above. It is a good idea to
perform the regression (and in it contact the guide) while being in the
house, but this is not necessary. We have the client ask the guide if
there is an earthbound soul (or possibly an entity) in the house. If
there is, we continue as already described.