Disinformation about the Nibiruans
received by Email on 10 January 2009
First published in
Biblioteca
Pléyades
This is a somewhat corrected and improved version
updated in July 2010
The book
We are the Nibiruans by Jelaila
Starr – allegedly an Anunnaki walk-in
– (The Nibiruan Council, Lenexa KS, 4th ed., no year stated) is a
remarkable collection of disinformation about the Nîbiruans
(Anunnaki), apparently created to polish their image beyond truth.
It claims to contain a message from Anu about the
“History of Universe & Earth” which, compared to the
texts of the Sumerian clay tablets and modern texts like
Bringers of the Dawn by Barbara
Marciniak, reveals itself as distorted and manipulative.
The original
murders
The Sumerian Creation Story in
Enûma Elish clearly
states that the prime creators Apsû and Tiâmat
were murdered!
They created three generations of gods of which the main
entities were:
Some of the gods complained about the behavior of the
“divine brothers” of Ea, which to them was annoying and
insulting.
They disturbed the order in the divine world and
Aspsû considered reversing their creation so that order would be
reestablished. This will not mean killing them, but taking them back
into the source, the original energy of creation. Their annoying
behavior can be understood as improper use of their free will, without
respect for others.
Apsû’s vizier and son Mummu advised
him to proceed with the reversal of the creation of these
“celestial rowdies”, but Tiâmat was against it, since
she was, after all, their prime mother. Ea discovered the plans and by
means of magic put Apsû and Mummu asleep and then killed
Apsû. Obviously, these Anunnaki – the people of Anu –
didn’t trust Tiâmat after this and wanted to destroy her,
too, but she armed herself against such a confrontation with terrible
weapons. Therefore, they hesitated to attack her, but Marduk accepted
the task to fight and kill her.
A rough cosmic fight followed, at the end of which
Tiâmat was also killed.
Tiâmat was associated with a no more existing
planet in our solar system. Some want to identify her with that planet,
but that doesn’t make sense in the context of the creation story.
It will rather be so that the planet was associated with her, in the
sense that people loyal to her lived there. In the fight, this planet
was split in half.
One half formed the Earth
and the other the asteroid belt.
Can the Prime
Creators be killed?
But is it possible to kill the Prime Creators? Of course
not!
This will, instead, mean that the Anunnaki separated
themselves off from them, made themselves independent, cut all
relations to them and went into a region of darkness. Effectively, the
Prime Creators were then “dead” to them.
Neither
Sitchin nor Starr
mention this part of the creation story in their books. They strive to
keep a
positive view of these “celestial rowdies”, not
mentioning the original murders. The strategy of the Anunnaki was to
make believe that the Prime Creators would be evil and they themselves
good, even though it was rather the other way around!
This subjective view is adopted by Sitchin and Starr, if
at all they mention Apsû and Tiâmat. But how could the
Prime Creators be evil? That is utterly unimaginable! The evil can only
be the “fall” of the Anunnaki into the darkness!
A relative darkness, in comparison with the primal state.
Marduk and Satan
Of course, the book We are the Nibiruans will
not be all wrong, but it is biased according to the above mentioned
view of “putting the evil on the other side”.
It is interesting to find that Marduk with another name
or in another aspect (the 4-dimensional aspect) is also called Satain!
And what does that mean? If you remove the “i”, I think you
get close to the answer… On several WebPages the names Satain
and Satan are treated as meaning the same entity.
Further on in the book it is stated:
“Marduk agreed to play his role as leader of the
Dark Forces in order to give mankind the necessary opportunities for
spiritual growth.”
A nice excuse, by the way …
And there we have it: Marduk is on the dark side and his
aspect of “Satain” fits well with that.
The flood
The book gives a highly biased view of the flood. It is
stated to have been the result of an attack on the Earth through
deviation of the path of a comet. Since the “Spiritual
Hierarchy” couldn’t stop it, they decided to not alert
mankind, since they would have to die, anyway. But the version in the
Sumerian Creation Story is quite different!
The “gods” were annoyed by the way mankind
had developed and wanted to destroy it.
Why were they annoyed?
The answer will be given in the Bible and in the
Books of Enoch, where it is
mentioned that the “sons of the gods (’Elohim)” came
down to Earth and had children with the daughters of man. Out of that
arose the “giants”, which are depicted as evil in the books
mentioned. But they may have been “giants” in another way
than physically.
The “sons of the gods” that way had brought
genes of the “gods” into the human race, and the offspring
most probably were “giants” in the sense
that they had capacities and abilities that humans didn’t have.
The “gods” had wanted the humans to stay undeveloped and
not understand the ways of the “gods”, so that they could
be more easily controlled and manipulated. With the new genes, a rapid
development set in!
That will be what the “gods” wanted to put
an end to with the flood! In the Sumerian text, Utnapishtim
(Noah) was informed and set out to save life forms through the flood,
and the “gods” were furious! No one should be saved! But in
the book it is put in another way: the “gods” are said to
be satisfied that life forms survived…
But in any case the offspring of the “sons of the
gods” was killed and the new genes were eradicated from mankind.
Eve and Lilith
It is strange that the book wants to state that Eve
would have been
Lilith.
Jewish mythology and what may be read between some lines
in the Bible show something else. Lilith was Adams first partner,
but she left him in order to emancipate herself, since Adam treated her
as less than him.
Then Eve was created,
instead.
Is Marduk
Yahweh?
This Yahweh was and probably still is
utterly cruel to mankind. Then came Jesus and began to
teach a truth which Yahweh didn’t want mankind to know.
He therefore intervened and had
Jesus killed and later infiltrated Christianity to have a Church
established, which is nothing but twisted and falsified Christianity
with an artificial dogma that better serves Anunnaki interests.
Cf. my article “The Real History of Christianity”
War-crazy
“gods”
The book claims that around 3700 BC mankind had finally
proven themselves mature enough for self-rule. Therefore, the Anunnaki
are said to have turned the rule over to them – but in reality
they, of course, stayed in invisible control “behind the
curtain”!
It is obvious that it was the war-crazy Anunnaki who
were immature, and it seems that they still may be. It is shocking that
these morally retarded “gods” never learn how wrong and
futile war always is, and that they seem to enjoy it much like someone
who isn’t grown up enjoys a war game at the computer (a mature
person cannot enjoy such a thing, either).
It is extremely sad that we humans have inherited genes
of such aggressiveness from the Anunnaki.
The war madness is in the book put in a way to make it
look like a “game”; a “game” that the Anunnaki
obviously enjoy. But there will be more to it. The truth is that they
not only enjoy war and killing, but that they do it
because they can steal life energy from dying bodies.
When people die violently, their “batteries”
are fully charged and there is much life energy to steal, but if they
die sick or old, the “batteries” are quite empty and there
is little or nothing to rob from them. Since the “gods” are
conscious in more dimensions than we are, it is easy for them to do so,
but mankind shouldn’t know it and therefore be kept in a
3-dimensional consciousness.
And that is where they will still want to have us.
True genetic
upgrade?
The book talks about upgrading the human genes.
I have the feeling than this is meant in another sense
than what the Pleiadians mention in the book Bringers of the Dawn
by Barbara Marciniak! Maybe what is really meant is a certain
improvement in some sense, yet maintaining control over the humans
– a pseudo-upgrade.
It also mentions love and compassion. I
wonder in what sense that is really meant …
Reptilians
Some of the people from “out there” are
stated to be
reptilians, but it seems
that the Anunnaki have a reptilian component themselves. Yet
there may also be other reptilians among the extraterrestrials.
When
Marciniak mentions “lizzies”, it in any case seems
quite clear that she refers to
Anunnaki (maybe not only,
but also). The website of this “Nibiruan Council” is
www.NibiruanCouncil.com.
There you will see pictures of the author of that book.
Maybe it is my imagination, but her eyes seem to look a little
reptilian to me …
Anu or Ashtar?
In the book – that makes the impression to be a
channeling from Anu – he claims that their people originate
from the Pleiades. If that is so, it would have to be before their fall
into the darker regions, since it would otherwise hardly fit with Bringers
of the Dawn, which is one of the very few channelings which gives
me a good feeling and appears to be quite genuine.
He describes Nibiru as not a planet, but a battle
starship, of which he was a commander. The way he describes himself
as he looks, he reminds of certain pictures of
Ashtar Sheran.
Is there a connection here?
Ashtar Sheran’s name read backwards becomes Naresh
Ratscha, which is pure Sanskrit, better spelled Naresh Raja,
which means “man-god king” (nara = “man”
and isha = “god” according to the rule of
sandhi in the Sanskrit grammar become naresha when written
together, pronounced naresh in to-day’s Hindi; raja
= king).
One source claims that he would be a
Pleiadian renegade.
He himself claims to come from a planet called Nirbua,
which sounds a lot like
Nibiru… He channels
since decades through various persons. Already the fact that he calls
himself “man-god king” and spells it backwards appears
highly suspicious to me, and various sources claim that he would be
a fake and
a pretender. He has also
been described as a kind of “space criminal”.
He calls himself a commander of a big fleet of
10 million spaceships, which is just too exaggeratedly unbelievable to
buy! His real name is said to be Aruseak.
If Anu of the book by Starr (being the real Anu or not)
was such a commander, originating from the Pleiadians (where he is no
more) and describes himself as looking quite like Ashtar Sheran
is said to look, one may certainly wonder about these parallels …
Ashtar and
Sananda
One more strange thing about this Ashtar Sheran
is that he often channels together with another one, who calls himself
Sananda and
claims that he was Jesus, which I find extremely hard to
believe!
He will rather be one of the many false Christs
we are warned about… He, too, has a Sanskrit name – for
whatever reason that may be. Sa means “wind, air”
but could also be a serpent. It may, however, in reality be śa
with the apostrophe over the “s” left out, which is often
done for simplicity, and that word means “destroyer”.
Ananda means
“bliss”. Does he feel “bliss” in destruction?
Each one of these two guys gives me an unpleasant
feeling… something is “fishy” here…
apparently many are hoodwinked by channeling entities who boost the ego
of the channeler, claiming that he or she would be “chosen”
for a special task.
I know of one case where
Ashtar and Sananda
make the channeler believe that she was Mary Magdalene – and there are
quite a few more than she who believe so…
Is
Yahweh in reality Marduk? In
my recent book in German
Es begann in Babylon
(Holistika, Meckenheim, Germany, 2008) I show that this is quite
probable.