THE SWINE FLU

This is a shorter version of my corresponding text in the German-language section.

The text was written in the fall of 2009, but now (March 2010) the flue is already over, and it never became a pandemic!

During about half a year, I have followed up lots of information in the Internet on the subject of the swine flu and the vaccination.

Results from so far gathered information

1.  The flue is much exaggerated! It isn't as bad as we are told. Media like to report about deaths, but these are so far considerably fewer than in waves of the hitherto common flues of past decades.

2.  The number of cases is quite exaggerated, too! In reality, they are not as many as claimed. In a large number of cases, no laboratory tests have been made to confirm that it really is the swine flu, or the confirmation has been negative. But media reporting followed the first assumption and didn't mention the other facts. False alarms were not corrected. It is also repeatedly reported about high numbers of cases in other countries, but travelers who come from there know nothing about it.

3.  Cases of deaths after vaccination are reported in a very reserved way, if at all. But they are not few. The same holds for serious complications after the vaccination (in many cases severe headaches and so strong muscle pains that one cannot walk for a few days, also fevers of up to and above 40° C or 100°F). Governments have signed extensive contracts with the manufacturers and committed themselves to buying quantities of vaccines corresponding to the population number. According to the freedom of information act, such contracts are, in part, publicly available, but they are censored: important sections of the text are blacked out. It has been revealed that in such a section one has committed to not publicly report cases of deaths or serious complications before these have been investigated by representatives of the manufacturer (which is, of cause, filibustered and a relation to the vaccination is denied). Representatives of authorities have cynically expressed that side effects merely indicate that the vaccination is effective!! That is a fairy-tail repeatedly told by the pharmaceutical industry when criticized for side effects of their remedies (“No effect without side-effects” is simply not true, but a mere marketing strategy). To me this is much more – and certainly, when side effects are that severe – evidence that something is wrong with the vaccination and that the body tries to defend itself against it.

4.  Amnesty has been granted to manufacturers in order to prevent court procedures for compensation in the case of vaccination damages. The one who suffers damage gets nothing and the case is as far as possible kept secret.

5.  The number of persons vaccinated is also exaggerated. In many cases the number of vaccine ampoules delivered has been reported as the number of vaccinations, even though large numbers of these ampoules have not (yet) been used. When, for example, Austrian media reported a run for the jabs in reality less then 10 persons came when the vaccinations started in Salzburg... In many European countries, the number of those refusing vaccination is considerably higher than of those who take it.

6.  Criticism is censored in the media and rather not published. In Sweden, for example, critical contributions to blogs and forums disappear quickly and critical “letters to the editor” are not published by the press. Some physicians lost their jobs because they expressed criticism.

7.  One has tried to create a “last-minute panic” with reports about scarcity of vaccines. The intention is to make people run for the jabs, whereas the sensible reaction would be: “Then I can reconsider it, because the next delivery will soon come”.

8.  Vaccines contain up to 20 “adjuvants”, added substances of in many cases a really obscure kind. It has become known that VIPs (politicians and others) get vaccinations without these additives!

9.  It has also become known that the vaccine is only allowed to be injected with the needle that comes with it (another of the censored clauses in the contracts). In Norway, a delivery couldn't be used because of that, since the needles were missing, and one had to wait for them to come... This raises a suspicion that there is something in the needle that should be injected, too. Why else special needles? (The cut of the tip has no importance here!)

10. In the midst of a financial crisis BILLIONS are thrown out for an undertaking in which behind the apparent front something else is obviously hidden. No wonder, then, that politicians (such as Angela Merkel of Germany) have stated that this crisis isn't over yet but will become worse in 2010. Is there an intention to make it worse? Or is this an attempt to let lots of money flow into other channels than for supporting job opportunities and national economy, and maybe put it aside for something else?

11. The Internet as a medium for free speech has here served an important purpose to largely thwart a suspicious vaccination program. Attentive persons who not too easily believe what public media report and what is lied to them from above have informed themselves independently to form an own opinion. Nearly everything that isn't reported in the press, radio or television and is censored in other ways can be found in the Internet. One may have to ask oneself how long it may take until also the Internet is censored...

Taking all this into consideration, you can hardly get around the impression that something is fishy about this whole thing! The vaccination appears to be the main thing and the flue merely a means to this end... Why is one taking such enormous effort to have people get vaccinated? Why should that have a first-degree importance? Is the flu dangerous? NO (see point 1)! Would it paralyze activities, factories and authorities because most of the population would be on sick leave? NO (see point 2)! These arguments are merely excuses. This will have to do with something else.

Jane Bürgermeister has revealed that this obviously artificial swine flu and the vaccination (allegedly against it) is in reality an attempt to reduce the excessive overpopulation of the world. Additives in the vaccine, which according to her investigation after a long period of time (so that it should not be connected with the vaccination) may even cause deaths or at least have other detrimental effects, would serve this purpose – effects uch as personality changes (to make people more easily manipulated), sterility or new diseases (which offer new markets for the pharmaceutical industry). An indictment document written by her, orderly handed in to court authorities, can be found here: wakenews.net/Microsoft_Word__Criminal_Charges__Swine_flu_edits_v2_1_.pdf. She on 112 pages in detail reveals this undertaking. Obviously, she is, therefore, ridiculed and in no way taken seriously by the law authorities, but her document is filibustered. She lost her job as a journalist because of that. The people must get that stuff, no discussion! In the process, several politicians and others belonging to some kind of an “elite” are largely exempted (see point 8 above).

Now, is all this true? Her investigation in my view in any case – the one way or the other and whatever it is! – does show that there really is something fishy here! The same impression arises from all the political efforts to influence us! It may well be that these additives have some manipulating effects and that there may also me undeclared additives! It is natural that Jane Bürgermeister is now called a paranoiac conspiracy hysteric. That is how one reacts in each and every such case! Or did you expect that one would admit it? If it is true: What other reaction would you expect?

Therefore: Do well consider what you do! And if you let yourself be vaccinated and after it (also in the long run) have real problems, don't forget that you wanted it ... and if your were talked into it: don't forget that you weren't steadfast enough!

As concerns substances in vaccines that reduce fertility, see educate-yourself.org/vcd/vcdvaccineslacedwithbirthcontrol.shtml.

NANO CHIPS

This has to do with a new technology with which one to day can produce nearly microscopic RFID-chips.

See www.hitachi.com/New/cnews/030902.html and www.pinktentacle.com/2007/02/hitachi-develops-rfid-powder. See also: video.google.de/videoplay?docid=6332071704916531144#, globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15092.

These are so small that they are easily injected unknowingly. They then get stuck in the tissue near the point of injection.

Supposing that such a particle is to be injected with the vaccine: How can it be made sure that it also gets into the body? If it floats around in the injection liquid, there is a high probability that it may not be sucked up in the syringe. And if it is sucked up, there is, again, a high probability that it stays in the syringe and is not injected. If, however, the chip is in the needle, it will be injected! Then one can, furthermore, “truly” claim that there is no such chip in the vaccine (itself)...

FURTHER COMMENTS

I wish to quote from a much too unknown book by the, on the contrary, very well known German top physicist and philosopher Carl Friedrich von Weizäcker (1912-2007): Der bedrohte Friede [“The Threatened Peace”] (Hansen, Munich, 1981 and 1994). He certainly was no conspiracy freak! Has he recognized something he shouldn't have recognized?

“For the purpose of maintaining power, the world population will be reduced. This will be done by means of artificially produced diseases. In this process, bio-weapons will be declared as epidemics, but also by means of intentional famines and wars. The basis for this is the realization that most people can no more afford to feed themselves and therefore the rich are forced to offer remedial actions, or an enormous and dangerous conflict potential arises.”

In the USA there is a growing number of poor people who live at the limit of existence and even under it. Since long in the slums and with the financial crisis the number is growing still more because of those who loose their jobs and houses. They also populate slums and tent camps outside cities. Does one want to get rid of the growing poor population? In certain circles one talks about “useless eaters”, who one would prefer to have eradicated. Such a flu could here be quite “useful”... since the poor cannot afford remedies and treatments and live in circumstances (undernourished, unclean conditions, unheated housings, etc.) under which they are more likely to die than the wealthy. A selection effect which will be welcome to many... and the poor population will be exempted from vaccination and get no invitation for it... a short-term effect for them – but the others will have the long-term effect of the vaccination! No one is supposed to escape...

HONESTLY REFLECTING THE FACTS

Is it really likely that in such a short time so many “extraordinary” virus mutations arose by themselves: Ebola, Marburg, HIV, SARS, bird flu, the original and the new pig flu...? Sure, viruses can mutate, but why in our times with such an acceleration? Mustn't there be something else behind this? We know that viruses can be modified in genetic laboratories! There are even patents for it. Is the flue actually there to motivate vaccination? Do we get a kind of “time bomb” with the jabs? Does it manipulate our personality? Does it make us infertile (in order to reduce population growth)? In spite of all denials there is still the suspicion that the short but awful Ebola epidemic was an experiment, administrating the virus with the polio vaccination in Africa. And HIV is still a riddle (and a kind of “time bomb” that later “explodes” as AIDS). What is really behind all this? Already the earlier reappearing waves of the Hong-Kong flu or the “Asian” left a bit of suspicion that one with a relatively harmless virus was studying ways and mechanisms of how an epidemic spreads... Did one have findings which are now coming to use with the swine flu? Was this also intended to build up an acceptance for flu vaccination (however doubtful its effect was already then) in the population?

IS ALL THIS MERELY PARANOIA?

As concerns conspiracy theories and those who believe in them or at least consider them to be possible, one conjures up them image of “lunatics” and “fanatics”. One shouldn't be as crazy as they are. Such a thing cannot – must not – be true! We are supposed to willingly swallow the food we are given. Therefore, many of us keep away from being considered as such “lunatics”, even though with an uneasy feeling in the guts.

A reminder of times past: “It cannot be true! That is only propaganda!”

That is how the population reacted in Nazi Germany to rumors about eradication of Jews and gassings in the camps. Hardly anyone wanted to believe it. People probably reacted similarly in the Soviet Union to rumors about Gulag and other camps. Are we back there now? Do we close our eyes and let it be done, even to ourselves? WILL THE “NEW WORLD ORDER” BE A BIOCHEMICALLY SUSTAINED FASCISM? Fearful? Yes! But it will only be worse if we close our eyes! The only thing we can do is to follow the principle of Gandhi: Non-cooperation! Civil disobedience!