What is hypnosis?
People who work with hypnosis often want to label everything that
has to do with an altered state of consciousness as hypnosis. That is a
political game, denied by the etymology.
If you like it, or not, the Greek word hýpnos (ὕπνος) does
mean “sleep”! Therefore, if the person (actually, his conscious mind) is not
more or less asleep, it by definition cannot be called hypnosis…
In my book about regression therapy I have, to mark a difference, introduced the
word agrypnosis, picked up by few. It is derived from the Greek word
ágrypnos (ἄγρυπνος) that means “wake, sleeplessness.” If the person is more
or less awake, even though being in some kind of an “altered state” of
consciousness, this would be the appropriate term.
Being asleep in some kind of a session means that the rational
mind is at least partially put asleep so that it does not really participate in
whatever experience the person then has. Typically, the person will have
forgotten it, or most of it, after waking up. This can, of course, be prevented
by means of a posthypnotic suggestion: “After waking up you will remember
everything!” But if that is not done, the so-called posthypnotic amnesia may
occur. The experience is not automatically integrated with the rational mind.
In an “agrypnotic” state, the person’s rational mind does
participate in whatever experience he or she has and remembers it afterwards.
The experience is automatically integrated with to-day’s rational mind, which I
consider important for the therapeutic use of a regression. There is no such
thing as a “postagrypnotic amnesia.”
In a deep hypnotic regression, the person to day is fully in the
consciousness of the person of the past and does not know things that were
unknown at that time. If there were no cars then and I ask about a car, I will
get the puzzled question: “What is that?” In an agrypnotic state, the person
will say: “There were no cars at that time.” As concerns therapeutic effects,
these can rather be achieved with posthypnotic suggestions. In contrast,
“postagrypnotic suggestions” are not needed. Furthermore, the person will not be
very suggestible in an agrypnotic state.
A rare phenomenon is xenoglossy, speaking a language the person
does not know to day (but knew in another lifetime). This only occurs in deep
hypnosis and not in an agrypnotic state. In the latter, the person knows the
content or meaning of what was said or written, but cannot reproduce
it in the old language. He or she says it in the language used to day.
Admittedly, there is no sharp line between agrypnosis and
hypnosis. A state can be more or less hypnotic, indicated, e.g., by afterwards
not remembering everything that came during the experience, or having a somewhat
vague memory of it, and needing a little time to understand concepts that were
not known then. If the experience occurred in an agrypnotic state, the person
may afterwards even be able to tell things he or she did not tell during the
experience.