The overpopulation catastrophe

Most people don’t want to see this as a catastrophe, because the thought is too frightening. Then one rather doesn’t want to know about it. However, common sense and logic require considering it. Otherwise, we stick the head into the sand, and that way it can only become worse…

To day, the population on the Earth is around 7 billions (in US terminology, in British English and other languages 7 milliards). One billion (milliard) or not more than two would be optimal. At present, the world population increases every day by 215 000 – net figure: births minus deaths. It doubles in, roughly estimated, 25-30 years.

At some point, the world will unavoidably be full! It will then have reached the point, where we can no more feed all of us (except the ruthlessly greedy). That is the point, at which it all breaks down. As long as it is half-full, we may think that it is still quite acceptable. When, then, will the world be half full? Only 25-30 years before it is full!

Some people think that there is still a lot of room in the world for living and for growing food. For that, we destroy nature, which is the real basis of life, and at the end, the world will be dead. People can then feed from synthetic food only for a limited period, until that breaks down, too. Then we may have a brief deadline period with “Soylent Green”… As the population develops to day, it cannot take very long until we are there! The room for living is also “only” half-full some 25-30 years before it is full!

The present idiotic effort for growth of production and economy is, as a Swedish philosopher put it in the 60es, a race towards the precipice. Business and industry strive for constant growth. It will be clear to anyone, who at least to some degree can think for himself, that eternal growth is simply impossible and eventually has to lead to a break down, most probably as a catastrophe. Unavoidably…

The business growth effort expresses in numbers: turnover and profit. The share market requires that, because a company with “too little” growth falls back at the stock exchange. To simulate higher numbers, employment is reduced, people are replaced by automation and companies are put together through acquisitions to make one overhead out of two and thus halve it on that level. Furthermore, one production site can then often be dropped. Alternatively, competition is killed and their employees are put on the street. Vigorous advertising in all media intends to motivate people to consume still more, and not the least of all the completely useless stuff…

It is obvious that such a calculation cannot be successful at the end. Since such business practice raises the unemployment numbers, the consumption reduces by the same rate, since buying power is lost. There is then another trick to simulate higher turnover: money deflation. Then the numbers become higher even if the real values don’t. A big secret devaluation was carried out by means of the Euro. Originally, 1 € should be worth approximately 2 DM (German Marks), but it didn’t last long until it was effectively worth 1 DM! Prices slowly rose to more or less double and turnovers could be written by growing numbers in Euros. For that, the effective values of the savings of the citizen became halved…

This consumption pressure requires buying power, but from where will it come? The growing numbers of unemployed don’t have it. They are not only the sacked ones, but also young people who cannot find a job. The pensions increase reluctantly, if at all, (and in cases are even reduced) and here very little buying power is left. Furthermore, pension funds shrink. Why? Those who pay to them are those who (still) work and have an income, and they are slowly becoming less. It is not so that the retired person gets the money back as a pension that he once paid to the fund. It doesn’t work that way. Instead, he gets it from the money that persons who have income to day pay to the fund, and what he once paid himself went to the retired persons of that time.  Hence, the government needs a sufficient number of contribution payers, or the system breaks down. For that, it needs more people that have jobs and work. And if they become unemployed, what then? Then even unemployment support comes on top of it! When the governments tried – as they did in the last century – to have the number of births increase, so that they would later have these as a working force, it was a catastrophic miscalculation, since this meant pushing a growing mountain in front of you, until it collapses over you.

What we may expect is shown in this Video.

For that reason, it becomes increasingly necessary not only to halt the population growth, but even to reduce the population! How can that be achieved? Education for voluntary cooperation? To no more have children (or not more than one per couple)? How many would participate in that? Many want not only one child, but 2-3 or even more. That is in a way understandable, but it is rudely contrary to a contribution to reducing the population in a few generations, in solidarity. If wee look at it that way, it actually is selfish to have more than one child – who wants more, could adopt one or two of the many orphans in the world, and with it really do something good! Because a gradual population reduction can only work if ALL cooperate! In solidarity! Otherwise, there is no hope… The situation is even a lot worsened because religions want to increase the number of their believers through making them have more children. A suicide policy for humanity. The Catholic Church still prohibits contraception and Muslims order their believers to have still more children, for that purpose.

An insurmountable problem to day is, however, that a population reduction message is not accepted in many cultures and in other cultures only by a minority that is capable of grasping how bad the situation is. For that reason, cooperation in solidarity isn’t possible in the world to day. Here – on the one side – common sense and logic collide in a destructive clash with – on the other side – selfish emotionality and religious policy…

This world has less and less to offer our children. A saying is that the children of to day are the unemployed of tomorrow. That is no joke! It is bitter reality for an increasing number. Or they are the war victims of tomorrow… We want to offer the best to our children, but what if that is no more possible in this world? If we can only helplessly watch in pain, what the world does to them? That hurts! Then, if not before, will we finally understand that it would have been much better for many children if they had never been born. Love would rather be to have spared them this…

Thus, it is in itself actually understandable (but the way it is planned is certainly evil) that the secret power behind the political world stage wants to reduce the world population, as the New World Order secretly intends to (and we unwillingly, unknowingly and unexpectedly allow to happen to our children!). What ways could there be? The rumor that the vaccination actions are secretly planned to make a growing number of persons sterile by means of “adjuvants” will not be only smoke without a fire. They are allegedly intended to prevent a conjured pandemic (which we have seen that they don’t), but by means of such “adjuvants” in the long run even to reduce the life expectancy of people. Environment poisoning and chemistry in food also have such an effect in the long run. So what are the chemtrails? Why do they spray stuff in the atmosphere for us to inhale without knowing it? What makes sick reduces population and, furthermore, brings money to the pharmacological industry… Endeavors of this kind are very selfish and they are also engineered to keep the rich and powerful out of it while eliminating the poor and needy.

The only approach of this kind that under then circumstances  would be reasonably acceptable would be something that would randomly make, e.g., 70 % of the population sterile, if only such a program would equally include all levels of population (and not keep the rich and powerful out of it), but have no other “side effects” whatsoever (vaccination has all kinds of side effects...). Thus the obstacle of the selfish personal emotionality mentioned above (that viewed on the humanity level is actually suicidal) could be overcome. Out of such false emotionality, much too many of us think: “What does it matter to the world if I have one or two children more?” (much like “after me the deluge”…). Because since most people think like that without a trace of solidarity, this is actually suicidal for the humanity…

Regrettably, it really seems to be that those behind the world stage would like to have a third and nuclear world war for a huge reduction of the population (this time much more than in the two other world wars together). Furthermore, one could this way introduce a war economy that would apparently “solve” financial problems and widen the areas of political power. But what kind of a world would we have after that? A radioactively polluted one! A world, in which vast areas would be uninhabitable – the room for living would be a lot smaller for the survivors – and in which the radiation would frequently cause diseases. The mighty and rich would also survive much better than the common people that they call “useless eaters”, because they are already preparing for that…

Some hope for a reduction though natural catastrophes that would equally hit rich and poor, rulers and ruled. However, the problem with nuclear pollution remains in this case! Because very many nuclear power stations would be destroyed. Even though they could be shut down in time (or even automatically), huge quantities of radioactive material would remain and be set free, even without a meltdown or an explosion. Apart from that, this alternative would, however, be the lesser evil.

Then there are also expectations for help from extraterrestrials. That extraterrestrials are there is something no rationally thinking person can reject, since it is simply impossible that we would be alone in this enormous universe. But that they would come to our help may be little more than wishful thinking. If they would intervene at all, it could come from a civilization that would rather abduct us to work camps on their planet… Already for this reason, I am quite skeptic about “rescue from space”! Yet I do consider it possible that among them are also benevolent and morally developed beings. But how are we to know which are, and which are not? We have to listen to our inner self, the inner feelings and our heart, and not to our easily cheated rational mind…

There are also some ideas around about ascension into higher dimensions. That would in that case happen to people, who until are sufficiently developed, spiritually and morally. But we already have that! When the body is dead, we do entre other dimensions! As souls! Who is sufficiently developed, can then stay there. Otherwise, we return into a three-dimensional embodiment. Then quite possibly on an Earth with a much reduced population (and for that reason we may have to wait longer before we can come back) and where the circumstances of life are developing anew and being restored. Or possibly on another planet. The one way or the other, we will all survive!